Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Roberto Cid Subervi vs David Pichler Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Subervi vs Pichler analysis and find out who is favored!
Roberto Cid Subervi vs David Pichler Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Subervi has won 50.98% of points on his second serve, while Pichler has won 50.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Subervi, in recent form, has won 56.97% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pichler has won 55.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.92% and 32.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Subervi has saved 53.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pichler has saved 58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Subervi has won 68.12% of matches played (W/L 47/ 22), with Pichler winning 46.03% (W/L 29/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Subervi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 119/ 81), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Pichler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 121/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Subervi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.47% of matches (W/L 40/ 13), where as Pichler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 20/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Subervi winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Subervi winning 2 and Pichler winning 1. The last match between Subervi and Pichler was at the Merida Challenger, 20-03-2024, Second, Clay with Roberto Cid Subervi getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Subervi and Pichler have played a deciding set 1 times, with Subervi winning 1 times and Pichler 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Subervi winning 0, and Pichler 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Subervi has played against opponents with an average rank of 189.99 while Pichler has played against players with an average rank of 196.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Subervi has won 76% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pichler has won 27% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Subervi has converted 44.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pichler has converted 46.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Subervi 1 - 0 Pichler
387
Rank
211
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
561
Rank
390
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
57% (278-207)
Career Total W/L
56% (342-267)
68% (21-10)
YTD W/L
43% (9-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Roberto Cid Subervi | David Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:19:38 | 2:19:38 |
| 1st Serve % | 80% (57/71) | 67% (54/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (42/57) | 69% (37/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (8/14) | 37% (10/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (34/81) | 30% (21/71) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 4-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
David Pichler
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Roberto Cid Subervi | David Pichler |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (21/10) | 43% (9/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (44/28) | 52% (25/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (362/289) | 51% (221/213) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 82% (9/2) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | 38% (5/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 64 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 71 | 59 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:34 | 1:41:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 246.19 | 260.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1390/2035) | 63% (871/1388) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (920/1390) | 68% (592/871) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (326/645) | 50% (258/517) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (119/257) | 45% (58/130) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (930/2096) | 40% (559/1402) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (7/6) | 42% (5/7) |
| Futures W/L | 78% (14/4) | 44% (4/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 68% (21/31) | 47% (9/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (8/10) | 25% (2/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (19/18) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (19/1) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 10% (10/1) |
Roberto Cid Subervi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Ilia Simakin
65%
(
71 of
109)
1st Serve %
50%
(
66 of
131)
2
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
35 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
45 of
131)
119
Total Points Won
121
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guido Ivan Justo
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Hady Habib
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Roncadelli
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
91%
(
60 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
0%
(
0 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
66%
(
25 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
24 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
14
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
97%
(
30 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
76%
(
56 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
8
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Stefan Kozlov
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Keegan Smith
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
1
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
David Pichler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Sorger
Player
David Pichler
90%
(
9 of
10)
1st Serve %
54%
(
14 of
26)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
56%
(
5 of
9)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
16
Total Points Won
20
|
2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
David Pichler
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
43%
(
21 of
49)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pietro Marino
Player
David Pichler
58%
(
55 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
36 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
David Pichler
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
David Pichler
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
11
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
David Pichler
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Subervi Vs Pichler Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Roberto Cid Subervi
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
